Campo Limpo Paulista

Planning with Nature and History

Abstract

Objective - This study aims to analyze the formalization of sustainability as a structuring principle in the Strategic Master Plan of Campo Limpo Paulista (2023), focusing on Article 3, identifying its normative relevance, implications for economic, social, and environmental development, and its implementation potential in the context of sustainable urbanism.

Methodology - The research follows a qualitative and exploratory approach, based on documentary analysis of the Master Plan, with emphasis on Article 3. The study adopts three analytical axes: normative (legal formalization of sustainability), operational (actions and guidelines for implementation), and contextual (articulation with territorial characteristics and local vocations). In addition, the analysis considers the application of the participatory methodology developed by the Public Policy and Projects Laboratory of FAU Mackenzie, which involved municipal managers, technical teams, and civil society in the plan’s formulation.

Originality/Relevance - The originality lies in selecting Campo Limpo Paulista as a case study of a medium-sized municipality, where sustainability is treated as a structuring principle rather than a sectoral or compensatory complement. The relevance of the study is in presenting a replicable model of sustainable urban planning, aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and grounded in effective social participation.

Results - Article 3 of the Master Plan establishes full environmental balance as a central guideline, integrating the pillars of economic development, social development, and environmental conservation. The plan organizes the territory into macro-zones that allow differentiated policies according to local characteristics. Furthermore, it demonstrates direct alignment with SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) and SDG 15 (Life on Land). The adoption of the participatory methodology ensured legitimacy and adequacy of the guidelines to local needs, consolidating sustainability as both a normative and practical foundation for municipal planning.

Theoretical/Methodological Contributions - This work contributes to the debate on sustainable urbanism by demonstrating that medium-sized municipalities can structure their master plans around sustainability. The application of the participatory methodology as a foundation for plan elaboration strengthens the articulation between civil society, public managers, and technical teams, offering a replicable model for other contexts. Theoretically, it reinforces the importance of integrating social, economic, and environmental dimensions in normative instruments, overcoming fragmented approaches.

Social/Environmental Contributions - The study shows how public policies can gain legitimacy and effectiveness when grounded in participatory processes. Socially, it strengthens democratic governance and transparency in municipal management. Environmentally, it provides concrete instruments for ecosystem protection, restoration of degraded areas, urban afforestation, and balanced land use. The experience of Campo Limpo Paulista demonstrates that it is possible to align global agendas (SDGs) with local realities, promoting more inclusive, resilient, and environmentally balanced cities.