The Socioenvironmental significance of the Urban Green Park in the Gama Administrative Region - Federal District, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17271/1980082722120265612Keywords:
Park, Green areas, Urban managementAbstract
Objetive: The socio-environmental functions of the Gama Ecological Park, in the Federal District, and its contribution to the quality of life of the local population were the reasons for the object of study.
Methodology: With a quantitative nature, this work used the systematic observation method with the help of the SOPARC application to record the profile of users and the levels of physical activity practiced at different points in the park.
Originality/Relevance: This urban park is located in a region with a shortage of green areas, and the ways in which it is used fill a gap in the literature on the topic.
Results: The research revealed that the majority of park visitors are adults (56.35%), followed by teenagers (28.37%), seniors (13.54%), and children (1.73%). There was a predominance of the male audience (73.13%) compared to the female audience (26.87). Most adults (40%) engaged in vigorous physical activities, while (59%) performed moderate activities.The results revealed an uneven use of the park, with a concentration of visitors in sports areas and a low frequency of children, the elderly, and women in other spaces. The research also identified a seasonal variation in the frequency of use, with a greater number of visitors in the dry months.
Theoretical/Methodological Contributions The theoretical and methodological contributions of the study include the application of the SOPARC method in a specific context and the analysis of the relationship between park use and the profile of visitors.
Social and Environmental Contributions – In social and environmental terms, the research highlights the importance of the Gama Ecological Park as a space for leisure, sports practice, contact with nature, and health promotion, reinforcing the need for actions that promote a more inclusive and diversified use of the park.
Downloads
References
BAPTISTELLI, A.; GIACOMINI, Q. A. Revitalização do Parque Antônio Cláudio Machado – O Parque Urbano como mecanismo para exercer Cidadania. In: SEMINÁRIO INTERNACIONAL DE ARQUITETURA E URBANISMO, 2., 2022, Joaçaba. Anais [...]. Joaçaba: Editora Unoesc, 2022. p. 193-202.
BARBOSA, M. V.; PIMENTEL, R. M. de M.; BILAR, A. B. C. Multidisciplinaridade da percepção ambiental aplicada às relações homem-natureza: Revisão sistemática. Journal of Environmental Analysis and Progress, v. 05, n. 02, p. 180-191, 2020.
BRASIL. [Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente (1990)]. Lei nº 8.069, de 13 de julho de 1990. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, [1990]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/mdh/pt-br/navegue-por-temas/crianca-e-adolescente/publicacoes/o-estatuto-da-crianca-e-do-adolescente. Acesso em: 18 set. 2024.
CUNHA, A. D. A. et al. A conexão com a natureza em parques urbanos brasileiros e sua contribuição para o bem-estar da população e para o desenvolvimento infantil. Sociedade & Natureza, Uberlândia, v. 34, e65411, 2022.
DEROSE, Kathryn P. et al. Effects of park-based interventions on health-related outcomes: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, v. 147, p. 106528, 2021.
DISTRITO FEDERAL (Brasil). Brasília Ambiental - IBRAM. Brasília, DF, 2024. Disponível em: [www.ibram.df.gov.br]. Acesso em: 18 set. 2024.
DISTRITO FEDERAL (Brasil). GeoPortal DF. Brasília, DF, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.geoportal.seduh.df.gov.br/geoportal/. Acesso em: 18 set. 2024.
EVENSON, K. R. et al. Park characteristics, use, and physical activity: A review of studies using SOPARC (System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities). Preventive Medicine, v. 86, p. 153–166, maio 2016.
JOGDANDE, A.; BANDYOPADHYAY, A. Identifying and assessing uses of public parks: A systematic literature review. Civil Engineering and Architecture, v. 10, n. 3, p. 1142-1151, 2022.
LOPES, G. T. de A. et al. Avaliação de uso de parques por meio de protocolos da saúde pública: um estudo comparativo. Ambiente Construído, Porto Alegre, v. 21, n. 2, p. 225–241, abr./jun. 2021.
MCKENZIE, T. L. et al. System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, v. 3, n. 1, p. S208–S222, fev. 2006.
NGUYEN, Phi-Yen et al. Green space quality and health: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 18, n. 21, p. 11028, 2021.
NHLBI NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE. Park Counters. [S. l.], 2024. Disponível em: https://sites.rand.org/park-counter/. Acesso em: 18 set. 2024.
ORGANIZAÇÃO MUNDIAL DA SAÚDE. Diretrizes da OMS para atividade física e comportamento sedentário: Num piscar de olhos. Brasilia: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde. 2021a.
PESSOT, Elena et al. Natural resources in health tourism: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 5, p. 2661, 2021.
RUFINO, Iana et al. Multi-temporal built-up grids of Brazilian cities: how trends and dynamic modelling could help on resilience challenges? Sustainability, v. 13, n. 2, p. 748, 2021.
RUSSO, Alessio; ANDREUCCI, Maria Beatrice. Raising healthy children: promoting the multiple benefits of green open spaces through biophilic design. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 3, p. 1982, 2023.
SÁNCHEZ, G. J. G.; MARTÍNEZ, P. M. P. La apropiación y el uso del espacio público urbano. Los comunes en el parque urbano. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, v. 21, n. 65, p. 57–85, 2021.
SANDOVAL CHÁVEZ, D. A. et al. Valoración económica de la multifuncionalidad de los parques urbanos. Revista de Economía, Mérida, v. 38, n. 96, p. 93–123, mar. 2021.
SILVA, P. V. C.; COSTA JÚNIOR, Á. L. Efeitos da atividade física para a saúde de crianças e adolescentes. Psicologia Argumento, Curitiba, v. 29, n. 64, p. 41–50, 2011.
THOMAZ, P. M. D. et al. Fatores associados à atividade física em adultos, Brasília, DF. Revista de Saúde Pública, São Paulo, v. 44, n. 5, p. 894–900, out. 2010.
VEITCH, Jenny et al. What entices older adults to parks? Identification of park features that encourage park visitation, physical activity, and social interaction. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 217, p. 104254, 2022.
WHITING, J. W.; LARSON, L. R.; GREEN, G. T. Monitoring Visitation in Georgia State Parks Using the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC). Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, v. 30, n. 4, 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Érida Machado Barbosa Pina, Jacqueline Roberta Tamashiro, Angela Kinoshita

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







